When I first heard that BBC2 were at least going to produce a (vastly overdue) documentary, I let out a hearty Huzzah! And then I began reading bits and pieces on what the film would actually be – a titilating account that would lean heavily towards his reputation “as a rutting stag.” Huh? The production-powers-that-be did research into Wellington, his military and political careers, his value to the British Crown through four monarchs, his achievements as a whole and decided to go with his love life instead? Aaaarrrgghhhh!
Now don’t misunderstand, I’ve been studying Wellington’s women along with Victoria and Jo Manning for decades. There’s some great stuff there, but given the chance to highlight Wellington in a documentary (finally!) I would have chosen to go in a different direction. And with a different actor to play Wellington. Don’t get me wrong, Richard E. Grant is a fine actor, but embodies none of Wellington’s looks.
The programe introduces Wellington’s perceived cruelty towards his wife, Kitty, but gives no hint as to the acrimonious underpinnings of their relationship – the secret mistake Kitty had made early in their marriage that put the first cracks in the bedrock of their marriage. More followed. However, to date no one, not a single Wellington historian, not even the author amongst the Wellesley, Lady Jane, has offered up a single concrete detail about the underlying cause for their rift. A book called, Wellington’s Wife, written by a self professed intimate of the family is, perhaps, the book that says the least about their relationship. The second Duke, admittedly, consigned to the fire the cruelest of Wellington’s letters to Kitty, so that the ability to say that all documentation about this facet of their lives helps the present day family to preserve what sanctity there was in that marriage. However, I maintain that some items that could shed light on the problems still remain and that, if they truly do not, the Family, at least, know the reasons and have chosen to keep these, or corroborating family lore, to themselves. Which is, after all, their right.
The best parts are the participation of the newest Duke of Wellington and historian Dan Snow.
After actually watching the show, I must say that it was less terrible than I’d feard and more well rounded than I had been lead to believe beforehand. I still hold out hope that someone with the talent necessary will tell this a rich and long story, following the whole of Wellington’s fascinating life.
I thought it was a strange casting choice as well. I do like Richard E. Grant, but you're right in that he resembles Wellington not at all. And the focus on his sex life could be a dodge due to financial interests. After all, anything overly sweeping might well cost BBC 2 a whale of a lot more than bedroom scenes would. Just a thought.
Ah, well. Time will tell.
Glad I read this. Thank you.
Rose
I heard/read that Arthur went away to India without any commitment having been made on his part but that he was later told that Kitty considered them betrothed in all but actual words . He married her because, so the story goes, that it was expected.He was not in love with her and thought her looks had gone.
Any man who engages in affairs while married hurts his wife . I don't know that Wellington did so. He was considered a ladies' man.
There was a mention in a letter on another blog yesterday where Maria Edgeworth ( I think it was) said how Wellington's wife ran to the man with news of some battle to know whether her husband was OK.
Kitty did indeed regularly ask others at horse guards Whitehall downing street for news regarding wellington. She understood that the govt would hear first, before civilian mails could provide I telligence.